Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29730484›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2018

Current perspectives on the cerebellum and reading development.

Travis A Alvarez, Julie A Fiez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Progressive verbal apraxia of reading.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cerebellar Neuromodulation Impacts Reading Fluency in Young Adults.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Travis A AlvarezDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 210 South Bouquet Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States; Learning Research and Development Center, 3939 O'hara St, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: taa52@pitt.edu.
Julie A FiezDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 210 South Bouquet Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States; Learning Research and Development Center, 3939 O'hara St, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Behavioral Brain ResearchT32GM081760 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A, HOLT, LORI L · 2007 to 2021
$4.3M
Reading and the Right FusiformR01HD060388 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060388NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dominant neural models of typical and atypical reading focus on the cerebral cortex. However, Nicolson et al. (2001) proposed a model, the cerebellar deficit hypothesis, in which the cerebellum plays an important role in reading. To evaluate the evidence in support of this model, we qualitatively review the current literature and employ meta-analytic tools examining patterns of functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the cerebral reading network. We find evidence for a phonological circuit with connectivity between the cerebellum and a dorsal fronto-parietal pathway, and a semantic circuit with cerebellar connectivity to a ventral fronto-temporal pathway. Furthermore, both cerebral pathways have functional connections with the mid-fusiform gyrus, a region implicated in orthographic processing. Consideration of these circuits within the context of the current literature suggests the cerebellum is positioned to influence both phonological and word-based decoding procedures for recognizing unfamiliar printed words. Overall, multiple lines of research provide support for the cerebellar deficit hypothesis, while also highlighting the need for further research to test mechanistic hypotheses.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCerebellumHumansNeural PathwaysReadingRecognition, PsychologyVerbal LearningCerebellar deficit hypothesisDecodingNetworkPhonologicalReading developmentSemantic

Identifiers

PMID29730484
PMCPMC6078792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.