Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29729903›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.

Ruth Y Litovsky, Keng Moua, Shelly Godar, Alan Kan, Sara M Misurelli, Daniel J Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth Y LitovskyUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Waisman Center, USA; University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, USA. Electronic address: Litovsky@waisman.wisc.edu.
Keng MouaUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Waisman Center, USA.
Shelly GodarUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Waisman Center, USA.
Alan KanUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Waisman Center, USA.
Sara M MisurelliUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Waisman Center, USA; University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, USA.
Daniel J LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Directional Hearing in Complex Auditory EnvironmentsR01DC003083 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2004 to 2020
$7.4M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SVAREN, JOHN P · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Restoring binaural hearing abilities to bilateral cochlear implant usersR03DC015321 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KAN, ALAN HO LUN · 2016 to 2018
$459k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003083NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC015321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, cochlear implants (CIs) have been provided in growing numbers to people with not only bilateral deafness but also to people with unilateral hearing loss, at times in order to alleviate tinnitus. This study presents audiological data from 15 adult participants (ages 48 ± 12 years) with single sided deafness. Results are presented from 9/15 adults, who received a CI (SSD-CI) in the deaf ear and were tested in Acoustic or Acoustic + CI hearing modes, and 6/15 adults who are planning to receive a CI, and were tested in the unilateral condition only. Testing included (1) audiometric measures of threshold, (2) speech understanding for CNC words and AzBIO sentences, (3) tinnitus handicap inventory, (4) sound localization with stationary sound sources, and (5) perceived auditory motion. Results showed that when listening to sentences in quiet, performance was excellent in the Acoustic and Acoustic + CI conditions. In noise, performance was similar between Acoustic and Acoustic + CI conditions in 4/6 participants tested, and slightly worse in the Acoustic + CI in 2/6 participants. In some cases, the CI provided reduced tinnitus handicap scores. When testing sound localization ability, the Acoustic + CI condition resulted in improved sound localization RMS error of 29.2° (SD: ±6.7°) compared to 56.6° (SD: ±16.5°) in the Acoustic-only condition. Preliminary results suggest that the perception of motion direction, whereby subjects are required to process and compare directional cues across multiple locations, is impaired when compared with that of normal hearing subjects.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAdultAgedAudiometryAuditory ThresholdFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing Loss, UnilateralHearing TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionBilateralCochlear implantSingle sided deafnessSound localizationTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID29729903
PMCPMC6301120
OpenAlexW2801245492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.