Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29729661›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2018

A Longitudinal Study Examining Changes in Street Connectivity, Land Use, and Density of Dwellings and Walking for Transport in Brisbane, Australia.

Rebecca Bentley, Tony Blakely, Anne Kavanagh, Zoe Aitken, Tania King, Paul McElwee, Billie Giles-Corti, Gavin Turrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reliability of T-WSI to Evaluate Neighborhoods Walkability and Its Changes over Time.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Urban Moveability and physical activity in children: longitudinal results from the IDEFICS and I.Family cohort.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Urban Densification and 12-Year Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Markers.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca BentleyMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tony BlakelyMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anne KavanaghMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Zoe AitkenMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tania KingMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Paul McElweeInstitute for Health and Aging, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Billie Giles-CortiRMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gavin TurrellMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocieties face the challenge of keeping people active as they age. Walkable neighborhoods have been associated with physical activity, but more rigorous analytical approaches are needed.

objectivesWe used longitudinal data from adult residents of Brisbane, Australia (40-65 years of age at baseline) to estimate effects of changes in neighborhood characteristics over a 6-y period on the likelihood of walking for transport.

methodsAnalyses included 2,789-9,747 How Areas Influence Health and Activity (HABITAT) cohort participants from 200 neighborhoods at baseline (2007) who completed up to three follow-up questionnaires (through 2013). Principal components analysis was used to derive a proxy measure of walkability preference. Environmental predictors were changes in street connectivity, residential density, and land use mix within a one-kilometer network buffer. Associations with any walking and minutes of walking were estimated using logistic and linear regression, including random effects models adjusted for time-varying confounders and a measure of walkability preference, and fixed effects models of changes in individuals to eliminate confounding by time-invariant characteristics.

resultsAny walking for transport (vs. none) was increased in association with an increase in street connectivity (+10 intersections, fixed effects OR=1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07, 1.32), residential density (+5 dwellings/hectare, OR=1.10; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.15), and land-use mix (10% increase, OR=1.12; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26). Associations with minutes of walking were positive based on random effects models, but null for fixed effects models. The association between land-use mix and any walking appeared to be limited to participants in the highest tertile of increased street connectivity (fixed effects OR=1.17; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.35 for a 1-unit increase in land-use mix; interaction

conclusionsIncreases in street connectivity, residential density, and land-use heterogeneity were associated with walking for transport among middle-age residents of Brisbane, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2080.

Indexed as

WalkingAdultAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironment DesignFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29729661
PMCPMC6072026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.