Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29729062›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2018

Chromosome-based survey sequencing reveals the genome organization of wild wheat progenitor Triticum dicoccoides.

Bala Ani Akpinar, Sezgi Biyiklioglu, Burcu Alptekin, Miroslava Havránková, Jan Vrána, Jaroslav Doležel, Assaf Distelfeld, Pilar Hernandez, IWGSC, Hikmet Budak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insights on decoding wheat and barley genomes.Functional & integrative genomics · 2021
    Article
  7. Dynamic evolution of Panax species.Genes & genomics · 2021
    Review
  8. Genetic mapping of a novel powdery mildew resistance gene in wild emmer wheat from "Evolution Canyon" in Mt. Carmel Israel.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bala Ani AkpinarDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Cereal Genomics Lab, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Sezgi BiyikliogluDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Cereal Genomics Lab, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Burcu AlptekinDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Cereal Genomics Lab, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Miroslava HavránkováCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan VránaCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav DoleželCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-0492
Assaf DistelfeldDepartment of Molecular Biology and Ecology of Plants, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Pilar HernandezInstituto de Agricultura Sostenible (IAS), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Cordoba, Spain.
IWGSCInternational Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hikmet BudakDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Cereal Genomics Lab, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2556-2478

Funding

Czech Science Foundation P501/12/G090Junta de Andalucia P12-AGR-0482MINECO AGL2016-77149-C2-1-PMINECO CGL2016-79790-PMinistry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic LO1204National Program of Sustainability IWinifred-Asbjornson
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) is the progenitor of wheat. We performed chromosome-based survey sequencing of the 14 chromosomes, examining repetitive sequences, protein-coding genes, miRNA/target pairs and tRNA genes, as well as syntenic relationships with related grasses. We found considerable differences in the content and distribution of repetitive sequences between the A and B subgenomes. The gene contents of individual chromosomes varied widely, not necessarily correlating with chromosome size. We catalogued candidate agronomically important loci, along with new alleles and flanking sequences that can be used to design exome sequencing. Syntenic relationships and virtual gene orders revealed several small-scale evolutionary rearrangements, in addition to providing evidence for the 4AL-5AL-7BS translocation in wild emmer wheat. Chromosome-based sequence assemblies contained five novel miRNA families, among 59 families putatively encoded in the entire genome which provide insight into the domestication of wheat and an overview of the genome content and organization.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantConserved SequenceFlow CytometryGenes, PlantGenetic LociGenome, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicroRNAsPoaceaePolyploidyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, UntranslatedTetraploidyTriticumMicroRNAsRNA, Untranslatedchromosome sortingcomparative genomicshexaploid wheatnext-generation sequencingwild emmer wheat

Identifiers

PMID29729062
PMCPMC6230948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.