ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018
Reclassification of risk in an emergency referral center: the need for a specific tool for the classification of onco-hematological patients. A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Patients with cancer: a challenge for emergency departments].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- A modified emergency severity index level is associated with outcomes in cancer patients with COVID-19.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on routine oncology versus emergency care at a high volume cancer centre.European journal of clinical investigation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In emergency rooms, patients are usually classified using scales for predicting risk, resource usage, and the maximum time for receiving medical care. Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is a frequently used scale in this context. However, every patient with cancer is automatically classified as ESI level 3. In this study, patients with cancer seen at an emergency setting were reclassified using the ESI without the "cancer" parameter to verify whether there would be any change in the classification. Cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of all cancer patients who sought immediate care at a private center in Brazil during a 6-month period was included in the study. After receiving care according to the institution's standards, they were reclassified using the ESI scale without the "cancer" parameter. Times to receiving care and to reaching a diagnosis were recorded. In the study period, 360 patients were reclassified. They sought treatment for infection, pain, and gastrointestinal problems related to chemotherapy. The reclassification led to significant changes in the ESI risk level: 8.8% of the patients initially classified as level 4 had their level changed, as did 10.6% of those at level 3. The number of patients reclassified as level 1 was 3.2% higher than that of the initial classification (p < 0.001). There is a need to create a new scale for the classification of risk that takes the characteristics of patients receiving cancer treatment into account. Specific populations require specific classification scales for better evaluation of risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.