Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728932›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Reclassification of risk in an emergency referral center: the need for a specific tool for the classification of onco-hematological patients. A cross-sectional study.

Luciana Lopes Manfredini, Gislene Padilha Dos Santos, Ana Fernanda Yamazaki Centrone, Nelson Hamerschlak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Patients with cancer: a challenge for emergency departments].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luciana Lopes ManfrediniOncology Center, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gislene Padilha Dos SantosOncology and Hematology Center, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Fernanda Yamazaki CentroneOncology and Hematology Center, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nelson HamerschlakHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/520, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05256-900, Brazil. hamer@einstein.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-5310
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In emergency rooms, patients are usually classified using scales for predicting risk, resource usage, and the maximum time for receiving medical care. Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is a frequently used scale in this context. However, every patient with cancer is automatically classified as ESI level 3. In this study, patients with cancer seen at an emergency setting were reclassified using the ESI without the "cancer" parameter to verify whether there would be any change in the classification. Cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of all cancer patients who sought immediate care at a private center in Brazil during a 6-month period was included in the study. After receiving care according to the institution's standards, they were reclassified using the ESI scale without the "cancer" parameter. Times to receiving care and to reaching a diagnosis were recorded. In the study period, 360 patients were reclassified. They sought treatment for infection, pain, and gastrointestinal problems related to chemotherapy. The reclassification led to significant changes in the ESI risk level: 8.8% of the patients initially classified as level 4 had their level changed, as did 10.6% of those at level 3. The number of patients reclassified as level 1 was 3.2% higher than that of the initial classification (p < 0.001). There is a need to create a new scale for the classification of risk that takes the characteristics of patients receiving cancer treatment into account. Specific populations require specific classification scales for better evaluation of risk.

Indexed as

BrazilCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexTriageEmergency nursingEvidence-based emergency medicineOncology service, hospitalRisk assessmentRisk factorsTriage

Identifiers

PMID29728932
OpenAlexW2801039434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.