Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728769›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2018

Correction to: Patient Adherence to Dysphagia Recommendations: A Systematic Review.

Brittany N Krekeler, Courtney K Broadfoot, Stephen Johnson, Nadine P Connor, Nicole Rogus-Pulia

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brittany N KrekelerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Medical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, Room 483, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. brittany.krekeler@wisc.edu.
Courtney K BroadfootDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Medical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, Room 483, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Stephen JohnsonEbling Library, Health Sciences Learning Center, University of Wisconsin, Room 2336, 750 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2221, USA.
Nadine P ConnorDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Medical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, Room 483, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Nicole Rogus-PuliaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Medical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, Room 483, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes. The second sentence in the section "Results", under the heading "Study Design" was incorrect. It should read as: Two studies [24, 29] used a prospective cohort study design with a JAMA rating of 2. Four studies [17, 25, 27, 34] completed retrospective studies earning a JAMA score of 3. Four studies [26, 28, 30, 33] earned a JAMA quality rating score of 4 and used the following designs: case series [26, 28, 33], and pilot study [30]. In Table 1, "Study Population (n)" and "Design (JAMA quality rating)" values were incorrect for Shinn et al. (2013) [24]. The correct information is given here. HNC (n = 109) Prospective Cohort (2).

Identifiers

PMID29728769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.