Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728765›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

Open-circuit respirometry: real-time, laboratory-based systems.

Susan A Ward

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Current definitions of the breathing cycle in alveolar breath-by-breath gas exchange analysis.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Interchangeability between two breath-by-breath OEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers for Estimating VOInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susan A WardHuman Bio-Energetics Research Centre, Crickhowell, Wales, NP8 1AT, UK. saward@dsl.pipex.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the conceptual and technological factors integral to the development of laboratory-based, automated real-time open-circuit mixing-chamber and breath-by-breath (B × B) gas-exchange systems, together with considerations of assumptions and limitations. Advances in sensor technology, signal analysis, and digital computation led to the emergence of these technologies in the mid-20th century, at a time when investigators were beginning to recognise the interpretational advantages of nonsteady-state physiological-system interrogation in understanding the aetiology of exercise (in)tolerance in health, sport, and disease. Key milestones include the 'Auchincloss' description of an off-line system to estimate alveolar O

Indexed as

ExerciseMuscle ContractionRespirationBreath TestsExercise TestHumansLungModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsAlgorithmsCardiopulmonary exercise testingExerciseKineticsNoiseSensorsSignal analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.