SynthesisBone marrow transplantation2018
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult sickle cell disease in the era of universal donor availibility.
Synthesis in Bone marrow transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current projections estimate that the number of newborns with sickle cell disease (SCD) globally will exceed 400,000 by 2050. Over the last three decades, increased newborn screening, supportive care, and use of hydroxyurea therapy, have decreased early childhood mortality among individuals affected with SCD. Despite hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) being curative in SCD, its impact on disease free survival remains unknown, especially in adults, partly due to previous limitations in donor options and perceived mortality in adults using myeloablative conditioning. Novel non-myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimens have made HCT safer and applicable to adults with SCD who were previously excluded. Other reasons for limited use of HCT in SCD includes referral bias, provider preference, poor education of patient/families, perceived procedure risks, costs and limited logistic resources in both low income, middle income, and high income countries. Current data from landmark studies indicate that both the long-term disease-free survival and overall survival exceed 90% after matched sibling donor HCT in children. Improving transplant outcomes and expanding donor pool will increase the use of transplant for SCD, especially in affected adults. On-going investigations using matched umbilical cord units, unrelated matched donor, and related haploidentical donors, promises to make HCT a viable option for nearly all eligible patients with SCD. This systematic review focuses on the recent data for HCT for patients with adult SCD with particular emphasis on donor sources and availability as illustrated by a case presentation exhibiting real world issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.