ReviewBlood2018
Defining success with cellular therapeutics: the current landscape for clinical end point and toxicity analysis.
Review in Blood, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventing secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) in CAR-T cell therapy through site-specific transgene integration into genomic safe harbors (GSHs).Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Cell therapy in pediatric blood diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Shape-Versatile Fixed Cellular Materials for Multiple Target Immunomodulation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Article
- Intracellular and Extracellular Antifreeze Protein Significantly Improves Mammalian Cell Cryopreservation.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- CRISPR-enhanced human adipocyte browning as cell therapy for metabolic disease.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular therapies play a major and expanding role in the treatment of hematologic diseases. For each of these therapies, a narrow therapeutic window exists, where efficacy is maximized and toxicities minimized. This review focuses on one of the most established cellular therapies, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and one of the newest cellular therapies, chimeric antigen receptor-T cells. In this review, I will discuss the current state of the field for clinical end point analysis with each of these therapeutics, including their critical toxicities, and focus on the major elements of success for each of these complex treatments for hematologic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.