Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728368›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2018

Rachel E Shaw, Benjamin Kottler, Zoe N Ludlow, Edgar Buhl, Dongwook Kim, Sara Morais da Silva, Alina Miedzik, Antoine Coum, James Jl Hodge, Frank Hirth and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. eLife · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A clinically-relevant residue of POLR1D is required for Drosophila development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adult Neurogenesis in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Ancestral regulatory mechanisms specify conserved midbrain circuitry in arthropods and vertebrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Restoration of Olfactory Memory inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rachel E ShawCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Benjamin KottlerDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-5791
Zoe N LudlowDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Edgar BuhlSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-5870
Dongwook KimDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sara Morais da SilvaDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alina MiedzikCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Antoine CoumCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
James Jl HodgeSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Frank HirthDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK frank.hirth@kcl.ac.uk rita.sousa-nunes@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8581-9450
Rita Sousa-NunesCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK frank.hirth@kcl.ac.uk rita.sousa-nunes@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-8081

Funding

Drosophila Transgenic RNAi Resource ProjectR01GM084947 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2008 to 2019
$9.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J017221/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N001230/1Cancer Research UK 14958Cancer Research UK RG2016/R1Medical Research Council G0701498Medical Research Council MR/L010666/1Motor Neurone Disease Association HIRTH/OCT13/868-792Motor Neurone Disease Association HIRTH/OCT16/890-792NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084947Parkinson's UK G-0714Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107414/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central hypothesis for brain evolution is that it might occur via expansion of progenitor cells and subsequent lineage-dependent formation of neural circuits. Here, we report

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGABAergic NeuronsInterneuronsMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Stem CellsNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear Proteinspros protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factorscircuit plasticityevolutionary neurobiologylineage expansionneural stem cellsProspero

Identifiers

PMID29728368
PMCPMC6028031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.