Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728285›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2019

Comparison of bedside screening methods for frailty assessment in older adult trauma patients in the emergency department.

Sachita P Shah, Kevin Penn, Stephen J Kaplan, Michael Vrablik, Karl Jablonowski, Tam N Pham, May J Reed

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Grip strength cut-points from the Swiss DO-HEALTH population.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Observational
  17. Review
  18. Patient Versus Physician Perceptions of Frailty: A Comparison of Clinical Frailty Scale Scores of Older Adults in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sachita P ShahDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Kevin PennDivision of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Stephen J KaplanDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Michael VrablikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Karl JablonowskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Tam N PhamDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
May J ReedDivision of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: mjr@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is linked to poor outcomes in older patients. We prospectively compared the utility of the picture-based Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS9), clinical assessments, and ultrasound muscle measurements against the reference FRAIL scale in older adult trauma patients in the emergency department (ED).

methodsWe recruited a convenience sample of adults 65 yrs. or older with blunt trauma and injury severity scores <9. We queried subjects (or surrogates) on the FRAIL scale, and compared this to: physician-based and subject/surrogate-based CFS9; mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and grip strength; and ultrasound (US) measures of muscle thickness (limbs and abdominal wall). We derived optimal diagnostic thresholds and calculated performance metrics for each comparison using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC).

resultsFifteen of 65 patients were frail by FRAIL scale (23%). CFS9 performed well when assessed by subject/surrogate (AUROC 0.91 [95% CI 0.84-0.98] or physician (AUROC 0.77 [95% CI 0.63-0.91]. Optimal thresholds for both physician and subject/surrogate were CFS9 of 4 or greater. If both physician and subject/surrogate provided scores <4, sensitivity and negative predictive value were 90.0% (54.1-99.5%) and 95.0% (73.1-99.7%). Grip strength and MUAC were not predictors. US measures that combined biceps and quadriceps thickness showed an AUROC of 0.75 compared to the reference standard.

conclusionThe ED needs rapid, validated tools to screen for frailty. The CFS9 has excellent negative predictive value in ruling out frailty. Ultrasound of combined biceps and quadriceps has modest concordance as an alternative in trauma patients who cannot provide a history.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsUltrasonographyAgedArea Under CurveFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHealth Status IndicatorsHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMuscular AtrophyPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesWounds, NonpenetratingAssessmentFrailtyGeriatricsOlder patientTraumaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID29728285
OpenAlexW2801383257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.