Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728086›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2018

The effect of universal maternal antenatal iron supplementation on neurodevelopment in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

C Jayasinghe, R Polson, H C van Woerden, P Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Hematologic Complications of Pregnancy.European journal of haematology · 2025
    Review
  5. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for iron.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Identifying and treating iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C JayasingheMinistry of Health, 385, Ven. Baddegama Wimalawansa Thero Mawatha, Colombo, 10, Sri Lanka. chinthaj@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-1785
R PolsonCentre for Health Science, University of the Highland and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
H C van WoerdenCentre for Health Science, University of the Highland and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
P WilsonCentre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK.
University of the Highlands and Islands · GBMinistry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine · LKUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough antenatal iron supplementation is beneficial to mothers, its impact on the neurodevelopment of offspring is controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess whether routine maternal antenatal iron supplementation confers later neurodevelopmental benefit to offspring.

methodsElectronic databases were searched using MESH terms or key words and identified papers were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The review was registered in the PROSPERO CRD data base.

resultsSeven publications were identified, based on four randomised trials published between 2006 and 2016. Three of the trials were in the Asian sub-continent. A range of tools were used to evaluate neurodevelopment. Meta-analysis of outcomes from the three RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria showed minimal effect of antenatal iron supplementation on the neurodevelopment of offspring, which was not statistically significant: weighted mean difference of 0.54 (95% CI: -0.67 to 1.75); test for overall effect Z = 0.87; p = 0.38; and heterogeneity 48%. Meta-analysis of outcomes of these RCTs at later stages of development produced similar results.

conclusionsThe benefit of routine antenatal iron supplementation on neurodevelopment in offspring was not statistically significant in this relatively limited set of trials, and some benefit cannot be excluded in areas with a high prevalence of maternal anaemia. A large randomized controlled trial showing significant benefit would be required to modify our conclusions.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDietary SupplementsAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyChildChild BehaviorCognitionFemaleFolic AcidHumansIntelligencePregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPrenatal CarePrevalenceFolic AcidAntenatalIron deficiency anaemiaIron supplementationNeurodevelopmentOffspring

Identifiers

PMID29728086
PMCPMC5936025
OpenAlexW2801436291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.