Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29728083›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Metabolomic profiles in breast cancer:a pilot case-control study in the breast cancer family registry.

Marcelle M Dougan, Yuqing Li, Lisa W Chu, Robert W Haile, Alice S Whittemore, Summer S Han, Steven C Moore, Joshua N Sampson, Irene L Andrulis, Esther M John and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Identification of a Novel Biomarker Panel for Breast Cancer Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Unraveling the Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Prostate cancer in omics era.Cancer cell international · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcelle M DouganStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. marcelle.dougan@sjsu.edu.
Yuqing LiStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Lisa W ChuStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Robert W HaileStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Alice S WhittemoreStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Summer S HanStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Steven C MooreNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joshua N SampsonNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Irene L AndrulisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Esther M JohnStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Ann W HsingStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · USNational Cancer Institute · USSinai Health System · CA

Funding

Stanford Cancer Institute N/A - Internal funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolomics is emerging as an important tool for detecting differences between diseased and non-diseased individuals. However, prospective studies are limited.

methodsWe examined the detectability, reliability, and distribution of metabolites measured in pre-diagnostic plasma samples in a pilot study of women enrolled in the Northern California site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. The study included 45 cases diagnosed with breast cancer at least one year after the blood draw, and 45 controls. Controls were matched on age (within 5 years), family status, BRCA status, and menopausal status. Duplicate samples were included for reliability assessment. We used a liquid chromatography/gas chromatography mass spectrometer platform to measure metabolites. We calculated intraclass correlations (ICCs) among duplicate samples, and coefficients of variation (CVs) across metabolites.

resultsOf the 661 named metabolites detected, 338 (51%) were found in all samples, and 490 (74%) in more than 80% of samples. The median ICC between duplicates was 0.96 (25th - 75th percentile: 0.82-0.99). We observed a greater than 20% case-control difference in 24 metabolites (p < 0.05), although these associations were not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

conclusionsThese data show that assays are reproducible for many metabolites, there is a minimal laboratory variation for the same sample, and a large between-person variation. Despite small sample size, differences between cases and controls in some metabolites suggest that a well-powered large-scale study is likely to detect biological meaningful differences to provide a better understanding of breast cancer etiology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesChromatography, LiquidFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMetabolomeMetabolomicsMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRegistriesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29728083
PMCPMC5935968
OpenAlexW2800014979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.