Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29727257›Full record

ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2018

How do Plants Keep their Functional Integrity?

Vadim Pérez Koldenkova, Noriyuki Hatsugai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vadim Pérez Koldenkovaa Laboratorio Nacional de Microscopía Avanzada , Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social , Av. Cuauhtémoc, 330, Col. Doctores, Del. Cuauhtémoc. 06720 , México D.F. , Mexico .
Noriyuki Hatsugaib Department of Plant Biology , Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota St Paul , MN , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike animals, plants possess a non-strict and sometimes very fuzzy morphology. Mutual proportions of plant parts can vary to a much greater extent than in animals, changing according to the environmental conditions and the plant needs of nutrients, water and light. Despite the existence of this fundamental difference between plants and animals, it passes almost non-reflected in most studies on plants. In this review we make a preliminary attempt to gather together the mechanisms by which plants preserve their integrity, not loosing at the same time the physiological (and morphological) flexibility which allows them adapting to the different environments they can populate.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsPlantsSignal Transductionecotypeslong-distance communicationplant morphogenesisplantspolarity

Identifiers

PMID29727257
PMCPMC6149517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.