Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29727196›Full record

ReviewAstrobiology2018

Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life.

Edward W Schwieterman, Nancy Y Kiang, Mary N Parenteau, Chester E Harman, Shiladitya DasSarma, Theresa M Fisher, Giada N Arney, Hilairy E Hartnett, Christopher T Reinhard, Stephanie L Olson and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Astrobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Bifurcations and phase transitions in the origins of life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Origins of life: the possible and the actual.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Prospects for detecting signs of life on exoplanets in the JWST era.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Modelling exo-biospheres for biosignature predictions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Life on Venus?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Edward W Schwieterman1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California , Riverside, California.
Nancy Y Kiang3 NASA Astrobiology Institute , Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington.
Mary N Parenteau3 NASA Astrobiology Institute , Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington.
Chester E Harman3 NASA Astrobiology Institute , Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington.
Shiladitya DasSarma9 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Theresa M Fisher11 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona.
Giada N Arney3 NASA Astrobiology Institute , Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington.
Hilairy E Hartnett11 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona.
Christopher T Reinhard4 NASA Astrobiology Institute , Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California.
Stephanie L Olson1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California , Riverside, California.
Victoria S Meadows3 NASA Astrobiology Institute , Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington.
Charles S Cockell16 University of Edinburgh School of Physics and Astronomy , Edinburgh, United Kingdom .
Sara I Walker5 Blue Marble Space Institute of Science , Seattle, Washington.
John Lee Grenfell20 Institut für Planetenforschung (PF), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR) , Berlin, Germany .
Siddharth Hegde21 Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.
Sarah Rugheimer23 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews , St. Andrews, United Kingdom .
Renyu Hu24 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California.
Timothy W Lyons1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California , Riverside, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet possibilities, we have compiled a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures, including gaseous, surface, and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features that are well known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for determining the minimum biomass required to maintain short-lived biogenic gases as atmospheric signatures. We focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et al. The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignature strategies, a goal left to companion articles in this series, but to review the current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate areas, and clear the way for a path forward. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Habitability markers-Photosynthesis-Planetary surfaces-Atmospheres-Spectroscopy-Cryptic biospheres-False positives. Astrobiology 18, 663-708.

Indexed as

ExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentOrigin of LifePlanetsGasesModels, TheoreticalGases

Identifiers

PMID29727196
PMCPMC6016574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.