Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29727027›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2018

The case for treatment fidelity in active music interventions: why and how.

Natalie Wiens, Reyna L Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie WiensDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Reyna L GordonProgram for Music, Mind & Society at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Biomarkers of Rhythmic Communication: Integrating Foundational and Translational ApproachesDP2HD098859 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORDON, REYNA LEIGH · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Rhythm in Atypical Language Development: Mechanisms and Individual DifferencesR03DC014802 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORDON, REYNA LEIGH · 2015 to 2017
$481k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the volume of studies testing the benefits of active music-making interventions increases exponentially, it is important to document what exactly is happening during music treatment sessions in order to provide evidence for the mechanisms through which music training affects other domains. Thus, to complement systematic and rigorous attention to outcomes of the treatment, we outline four vital components of treatment fidelity and discuss their implementation in nonmusic- and music-based interventions. We then describe the design of Music Impacting Language Expertise (MILEStone), a new intervention that aims to improve grammar skills in children with specific language impairment by increasing sensitivity to rhythmic structure, which may enhance general temporal processing and sensitivity to syntactic structure. We describe the approach to addressing treatment fidelity in MILEStone adapted from intervention research from other fields, including a behavioral coding system to track instructional episodes and child participation, a treatment manual, activity checklists, provider training and monitoring, a home practice log, and teacher ratings of participant engagement. This approach takes an important first step in modeling a formalized procedure for assessing treatment fidelity in active music-making intervention research, as a means of increasing methodological rigor in support of evidence-based practice in clinical and educational settings.

Indexed as

childrenlanguage impairmentmusicrhythmtreatment fidelity

Identifiers

PMID29727027
PMCPMC6215748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.