ArticleAnnals of botany2018
Immediate vs. evolutionary consequences of polyploidy on clonal reproduction in an autopolyploid plant.
Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A shift in species niche through autopolyploidy: from sexual to vegetative reproduction in Saxifraga oppositifolia.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Multiplication of peat moss (Sphagnum L.) species for climate action.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Colchicine-Induced Polyploidization Influences the Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Characteristics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Uncovering the reciprocal effects of plant polyploidy and the microbiome: implications for understanding of polyploid success.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Chromatin Accessibility and Gene Expression Vary Between a New and Evolved Autopolyploid of Arabidopsis arenosa.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Clonal growth characteristics and diversity patterns of different Clintonia udensis (Liliaceae) diploid and tetraploid cytotypes in the Hualongshan Mountains.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The novel expression of clonality following whole-genome multiplication compensates for reduced fertility in natural autopolyploids.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Genome balance and dosage effect drive allopolyploid formation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Learning to tango with four (or more): the molecular basis of adaptation to polyploid meiosis.Plant reproduction · 2023Review
- Greater flowering and response to flooding inAoB PLANTS · 2023Article
- Consequences of whole genome duplication for 2n pollen performance.Plant reproduction · 2021Review
- Phenotypic diploidization in plant functional traits uncovered by synthetic neopolyploids in Dianthus broteri.Journal of experimental botany · 2021Article
- Effect of Whole-Genome Duplication on the Evolutionary Rescue of Sterile Hybrid Monkeyflowers.Plant communications · 2020Article
- Transcriptome Profile Analysis on Ovarian Tissues of Autotetraploid Fish and Diploid Red Crucian Carp.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Clonal reproduction in polyploids is expected to exceed that in diploids, due to either the immediate direct effects of whole-genome duplication (WGD) or selection during establishment. The timing of polyploidy effects on clonality are largely unknown despite its hypothesized influence on polyploid success. This study tests the direction and timing of divergence in clonal traits in diploid and polyploid Chamerion angustifolium. Methods: Root bud production and biomass allocation patterns were compared between diploids and synthesized tetraploids (neotetraploids), and between neotetraploids and naturally occurring tetraploids grown in a common environment. Key Results: Neotetraploids produced more root buds and fewer sexual structures than diploids and natural tetraploids; diploids and natural tetraploids had similar root bud numbers and sexual investment. The root bud:inflorescence biomass ratio was 71 % higher in neotetraploids than in natural tetraploids. Root bud location suggests that ramet density in neotetraploid genets could be higher than in diploid genets. Conclusions: WGD immediately increases investment in asexual vs. sexual reproduction in C. angustifolium, potentially promoting within-cytotype mating and establishment for neopolyploids. However, evolutionary change after the polyploidization event negates the direct effects of WGD. Natural polyploids and diploids have similar root bud production and biomass allocation patterns, probably resulting from habitat- and ploidy-mediated selection on polyploids to become more like diploids. These results highlight the value of studying the effects of polyploidization in young vs. established polyploids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.