Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29726303›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2020

Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Lindsay M Sabik, Bassam Dahman, Anushree Vichare, Cathy J Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lindsay M SabikUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-4929
Bassam DahmanVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Anushree VichareThe George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Cathy J BradleyUniversity of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.

Funding

Disparities in Cancer Screening: The Role of Medicaid PolicyR01CA178980 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SABIK, LINDSAY MARIE · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicaid-insured women have low rates of cancer screening. There are multiple policy levers that may influence access to preventive services such as screening, including physician payment and managed care. We examine the relationship between each of these factors and breast and cervical cancer screening among nonelderly nondisabled adult Medicaid enrollees. We combine individual-level data on Medicaid enrollment, demographics, and use of screening services from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract files with data on states' Medicaid-to-Medicare fee ratios and estimate their impact on screening services. Higher physician fees are associated with greater screening for comprehensive managed care enrollees; for enrollees in fee-for-service Medicaid, the findings are mixed. Patient participation in primary care case management is a significant moderator of the relationship between physician fees and the rate of screening, as interactions between enrollee primary care case management status and the Medicaid fee ratio are consistently positive across models of screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultBreast NeoplasmsFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansManaged Care ProgramsMedicaidMiddle AgedPhysiciansPreventive Health ServicesUnited StatesUterine Cervical Neoplasmscancermanaged careMedicaidphysician paymentscreening

Identifiers

PMID29726303
PMCPMC6212332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.