Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29726053›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2019

Feather mites play a role in cleaning host feathers: New insights from DNA metabarcoding and microscopy.

Jorge Doña, Heather Proctor, David Serrano, Kevin P Johnson, Arnika Oddy-van Oploo, Jose C Huguet-Tapia, Marina S Ascunce, Roger Jovani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence and diversity of parasitic bird lice (Insecta: Psocodea) in northeast Arkansas.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jorge DoñaDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-9627
Heather ProctorDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-9556
David SerranoDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6205-386X
Kevin P JohnsonIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Arnika Oddy-van OplooDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jose C Huguet-TapiaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Marina S AscunceDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Roger JovaniDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8693-9742
Estación Biológica de Doñana · ESUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness CGL2011-24466Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness CGL2015-69650-PMinistry of Economy and Competitiveness RYC-2009-03967Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness SVP-2013-067939Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Program for Centres of Excellence in R+D+I SEV-2012-0262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites and other symbionts are crucial components of ecosystems, regulating host populations and supporting food webs. However, most symbiont systems, especially those involving commensals and mutualists, are relatively poorly understood. In this study, we have investigated the nature of the symbiotic relationship between birds and their most abundant and diverse ectosymbionts: the vane-dwelling feather mites. For this purpose, we studied the diet of feather mites using two complementary methods. First, we used light microscopy to examine the gut contents of 1,300 individual feather mites representing 100 mite genera (18 families) from 190 bird species belonging to 72 families and 19 orders. Second, we used high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and DNA metabarcoding to determine gut contents from 1,833 individual mites of 18 species inhabiting 18 bird species. Results showed fungi and potentially bacteria as the main food resources for feather mites (apart from potential bird uropygial gland oil). Diatoms and plant matter appeared as rare food resources for feather mites. Importantly, we did not find any evidence of feather mites feeding upon bird resources (e.g., blood, skin) other than potentially uropygial gland oil. In addition, we found a high prevalence of both keratinophilic and pathogenic fungal taxa in the feather mite species examined. Altogether, our results shed light on the long-standing question of the nature of the relationship between birds and their vane-dwelling feather mites, supporting previous evidence for a commensalistic-mutualistic role of feather mites, which are revealed as likely fungivore-microbivore-detritivore symbionts of bird feathers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBird DiseasesBirdsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemFeathersGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicroscopyMitesSymbiosisbacteriabirdsdietDNA metabarcodingecological interactionsfeather mitesfungihigh-throughput sequencinginteractionssymbionts

Identifiers

PMID29726053
PMCPMC6905397
OpenAlexW2799681961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.