Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725828›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2018

Comparison of effect of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on intracranial and systemic hemodynamic response to chest physiotherapy and tracheal suctioning in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Shalendra Singh, Rajendra Singh Chouhan, Ashish Bindra, Nayani Radhakrishna

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Management of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients: an evidence-based approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Association of early dexmedetomidine exposure with brain injury biomarker levels following moderate - Severe traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI study.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current Concepts in the Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Injury.Translational perioperative and pain medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Neuroanesthesia and pregnancy: Uncharted waters.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shalendra SinghDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajendra Singh ChouhanDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashish BindraDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. dr_ashi2208@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5685-2833
Nayani RadhakrishnaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Army Research and Referral Hospital, Delhi Cantt, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INArmy Hospital Research and Referral · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChest physiotherapy and tracheal suction cause sympathetic stimulation and increase heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) which may have deleterious effect in the head injured. We planned to compare the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on intracerebral and systemic hemodynamic response to chest physiotherapy (CP) and tracheal suctioning (TS) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

methodsProspective, randomized study in patients with sTBI, 18-60 years of age, undergoing mechanical ventilation and intraparenchymal ICP monitoring. Patients were randomized to receive either iv dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg (group I; n = 30) or iv lidocaine 2 mg/kg (group II; n = 30) over 10 min. After infusion of test drug, CP with vibrator and manual compression was performed for 2 min and TS was done over next 15-20 s. The hemodynamic response was recorded before, during and at interval of 1 min for 10 min after CP and TS. A 20% change in hemodynamic parameters was considered significant.

resultsThe baseline hemodynamic (HR, MAP), intracranial (ICP, CPP) and respiratory (SPO

conclusionsBoth dexmedetomidine and lidocaine were effective to blunt rise in HR, MAP and ICP in response to CP and TS in patients with sTBI. However, intravenous dexmedetomidine caused significant decrease in MAP and CPP as compared to the baseline and lidocaine.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAdolescentAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial PressureLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialDexmedetomidineLidocaineDexmedetomidineHead injuryHemodynamic responseLidocaineTracheal suctioning

Identifiers

PMID29725828
OpenAlexW2801892908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.