Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725712›Full record

SynthesisSkeletal radiology2018

Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhange Yu, Tianli Mao, Yaping Xu, Tengqi Li, Yanhua Wang, Fuqiang Gao, Wei Sun

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Imaging of gout: an atlas.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Review
  5. Advanced imaging techniques in crystal arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dual-energy CT applications in musculoskeletal disorders.The British journal of radiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Spinal gout diagnosis in chiropractic practice: narrative review.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhange YuDepartment of Acupuncture, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Tianli MaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yaping XuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Tengqi LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yanhua WangDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedics, Peking University People's Hospital, South Xizhimen Street No. 11, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Fuqiang GaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China. gaofuqiang0604@163.com.
Wei SunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China. 18901267995@163.com.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDual-energy CT (DECT) is being widely used in suspected gout patients in recent years. Many clinicians tend to use DECT instead of aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of gout, but its accuracy has shown controversial results. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of DECT in the diagnosis of gout. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature published in Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. Studies included are all clinical trials of DECT in the diagnosis of gout. Quality assessment of bias and applicability was conducted using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). We recorded sensitivity and specificity of algorithms and calculated positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odd ratio (DOR), and respective confidence intervals (CI). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was drawn to get the Cochran Q-index and the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsSeven studies were included in this review and showed high homogeneity. The analysis results presented the pooled sensitivity was 88% (95% CI 84-90%) and specificity was 90% (95% CI 85-93%). Then, we figured out that the pooled PLR was 8.48 (95% CI 5.89-12.22) and NLR was 0.10 (95% CI 0.04-0.24) respectively. In addition, Cochran-Q was 0.90 and AUC was 0.9565 in sROC curve.

conclusionsDECT showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of gout. Synthetically considering these DECT abnormalities could improve the diagnostic sensitivity. More rigorous and standardized studies are still needed to support these findings.

Indexed as

GoutHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosisDual-energy CTGoutMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29725712
OpenAlexW2799713411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.