ArticleDer Orthopade2018
[Knee school as a secondary preventive approach : The sustainable treatment of occupational gonarthrosis].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background2-6 months after successful medical rehabilitation in gonarthrosis, the positive effects remit without the implementation of adequate aftercare strategies.
objectivesA prospective comparative study aimed to investigate whether and to what extent the sustainability model of knee school for the secondary preventive treatment of occupational gonarthrosis is able to maintain positive treatment effects in the medium term. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 292 male employees from the building trade went through the three-week phase 1 of the biopsychosocial knee college with a focus on ergonomics and muscle strength training. In the following 12 months (Phase 2), the participants were contacted several times by telephone in order to motivate them to continue the training. While 178 employees voluntarily and locally continued their training in selected fitness centers with financial support (VG 1), and 38 employees opted for an individual home program (VG 2), 76 participants stopped all training (KG).
resultsAfter Phase 1, all groups showed significant improvements in the parameters mobility, as well as stretch ability and strength endurance of the thigh muscles, complaints of the knee and quality of life. While the parameters in VG 1 continued to develop positively after 12 months, the measured values in VG 2, with the exception of muscle strength, moderately remitted. By contrast, a significant decline in the measurement values partly below the status quo ante was observed for the KG.
conclusionsAs part of the aftercare, financially supported training in a fitness center with accompanying regular telephone contacts for male construction workers with knee discomforts shows positive effects if the participation is voluntary. Organized training in the fitness center is superior to individual home programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.