Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725703›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2018

Chiral Monomers Ensure Orientational Specificity of Monomer Binding During Polymer Self-Replication.

Hemachander Subramanian, Robert A Gatenby

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hemachander SubramanianIntegrated Mathematical Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. hemachander.subramanian@moffitt.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4869-5994
Robert A GatenbyIntegrated Mathematical Oncology Department and Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

"Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research", as part of Moffitt PS-OC, "Cancer as a Complex adaptive System"U54CA193489 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDERSON, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON ALLAN, GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2015 to 2020
$12.5M
NIH HHS U54CA193489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular homochirality is universally observed in living systems but the molecular and evolutionary dynamics that led to its emergence are unknown. In fact, there are significant disadvantages in using chiral monomers for polymerization, which include enantiomeric cross-inhibition in racemic medium and under-utilization of available resources for self-replication in the primordial environment. Nevertheless, most investigations of homochirality in living systems assume that the individual primordial monomers were chiral prior to the formation of self-replicating polymer and therefore focus on identifying a symmetry-breaking mechanism that might choose one enantiomer over the other in a racemic medium. Within the premise that the extant biomolecules are products of molecular evolution, we ask a related but distinct question: why is an achiral monomer molecule disfavored? Here we identify an evolutionary advantage for molecular evolution to choose chiral over achiral monomers to construct primordial self-replicating polymers. We argue that when polymerization is constrained to proceed in only one direction along the template, as in DNA, evolution favors chiral monomers and homochiral polymers. This evolutionary advantage stems from the ability of a chiral monomer to bond with the template in only one orientation relative to the template monomer, along the direction of polymerization. An achiral monomer, on the other hand, offers more than one possible orientation for bonding with the template monomer, due to the presence of symmetry elements in its structure, which would lead to inhibition of polymerization. We show that the requirement of orientational specificity leads to monomer chirality, by using a known relationship between rotational and reflection symmetry elements, within the constraint that the resultant polymers are helical.

Indexed as

Evolution, ChemicalPolymersStereoisomerismPolymersBiomolecular chiralityDNA strand directionalityMonomer rotation and reflection symmetriesOrientational specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.