Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725702›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2018

Assessment of the abuse liability of three menthol Vuse Solo electronic cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum.

Mitchell F Stiles, Leanne R Campbell, Tao Jin, Donald W Graff, Reginald V Fant, Jack E Henningfield

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664012 (A Single-Center, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study to Assess Elements of Abuse Liability for Three Menthol Electronic Cigarettes), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664012 nacompletednot on this map

A Single-Center, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study to Assess Elements of Abuse Liability for Three Menthol Electronic Cigarettes

TypeinterventionalSponsorR.J. Reynolds Vapor CompanyRan2016 to 2016Enrolled71ConditionsSmokingArmsOwn Brand Menthol Cigarette, Electronic Menthol Cigarette #1, Electronic Menthol Cigarette #2, Electronic Menthol Cigarette #3, Leading U.S. Nicotine Gum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Birth outcomes following intrauterine exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Abuse Liability of Electronic Cigarettes in Never-Smoking Electronic Cigarette Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mitchell F StilesRAI Services Company, 401 N. Main Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA.
Leanne R CampbellRAI Services Company, 401 N. Main Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA. campbel1@rjrt.com.
Tao JinRAI Services Company, 401 N. Main Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA.
Donald W GraffCelerion, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Reginald V FantPinneyAssociates, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jack E HenningfieldPinneyAssociates, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleWe previously reported that following a short-term product use period, use of non-menthol Vuse Solo electronic cigarettes (ECs) resulted in product effect-related subjective responses and nicotine uptake between those of combustible cigarettes (high-abuse liability comparator) and nicotine gum (low-abuse liability comparator); the results were generally closer to those of nicotine gum.

objectiveUsing a similar design to the previous study, we evaluated the abuse liability of three menthol-flavored Vuse Solo ECs with the same nicotine contents (14, 29, and 36 mg) in a group of EC-naïve, menthol cigarette smokers, relative to comparator products.

methodsSix-hour nicotine uptake and ratings of subjective effects were used to determine abuse liability and pharmacokinetics.

resultsUse of menthol Vuse Solo resulted in significantly lower responses to subjective measurements (product liking, intent to use product again, and liking of positive product effects), higher urge to smoke responses, and a lower peak (C

conclusionThese findings are concordant with our previous results and provide evidence that menthol Vuse Solo ECs have abuse liability that is lower than menthol cigarettes and potentially greater than that of nicotine gum.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02664012.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsMentholNicotine Chewing GumTobacco ProductsAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineNicotinic AgonistsSmokingTobacco SmokingYoung AdultMentholNicotineNicotine Chewing GumNicotinic AgonistsAbuse liabilityElectronic cigarettesMentholNicotine pharmacokineticsSubjective measures

Identifiers

PMID29725702
PMCPMC6015619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.