ReviewBioMed research international2018
Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Disruptions in cell fate decisions and transformed enteroendocrine cells drive intestinal tumorigenesis in Drosophila.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Dynamic Regulation of NF-κB Response in Innate Immunity: The Case of the IMD Pathway in Drosophila.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Non-apoptotic activation of Drosophila caspase-2/9 modulates JNK signaling, the tumor microenvironment, and growth of wound-like tumors.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Tumor models in various Drosophila tissues.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2021Review
- A time course transcriptomic analysis of host and injected oncogenic cells reveals new aspects ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Strategies for Functional Interrogation of Big Cancer Data Using Drosophila Cancer Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- JNK-dependent intestinal barrier failure disrupts host-microbe homeostasis during tumorigenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Animal Models to Study Cancer and Its Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- An RNAi Screen for Genes Required for Growth ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- The antimicrobial peptide defensin cooperates with tumour necrosis factor to drive tumour cell death ineLife · 2019Article
- Modeling Cancer with Flies and Fish.Developmental cell · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of cancer has represented a central focus in medical research for over a century. The great complexity and constant evolution of the pathology require the use of multiple research model systems and interdisciplinary approaches. This is necessary in order to achieve a comprehensive understanding into the mechanisms driving disease initiation and progression, to aid the development of appropriate therapies. In recent decades, the fruit fly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.