ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018
Middle segment pancreatectomy for a solid serous cystadenoma diagnosed by MRCP and review of the literature: A case report.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare Solid Pancreatic Lesions on Cross-Sectional Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pseudo solid-appearing pancreatic serous microcystic adenomas: Histologic diagnosis with the EUS core biopsy fork-tip needle.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid serous cystadenoma of the pancreas is the rarest subtype of serous cystadenoma. Cystic structures are difficult to recognize by imaging studies. In the clinical setting, it is crucial to discriminate a solid serious cystadenoma from other solid pancreatic tumors. The present study reported a case of solid serous cystadenoma in which the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings were useful for diagnosis and decision-making regarding the surgical strategy, with a review of the previous reports of solid serous cystadenoma. A 50-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for investigation of a pancreatic body mass. A 2-cm hypervascular solid tumor was revealed by computed tomography. No typical radiological imaging findings of small cysts were detected, such as a honeycomb structure, and an adequate specimen could not be gained by biopsy under endoscopic ultrasonography. However, the tumor showed high intensity on MRCP, suggesting its cystic nature. A solid serous cystadenoma was suspected based on these radiological findings, and middle segment pancreatectomy was performed as a function-preserving surgery. The histological findings were compatible with a solid serous cystadenoma. In conclusion, MRCP imaging may be helpful for diagnosis and decision-making regarding the most appropriate surgical method for solid serous cystadenomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.