Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725485›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Prognostic value of periostin in early-stage breast cancer treated with conserving surgery and radiotherapy.

Changyou Li, Jing Xu, Qi Wang, Shaoqing Geng, Zheng Yan, Jin You, Zhenfeng Li, Xiao Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Changyou LiBiotherapy Center, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Jing XuDepartment of Pathology, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Qi WangDepartment of Pathology, Qingdao Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Shaoqing GengDepartment of Pathology, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Zheng YanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Jin YouAnorectal Department, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Zhenfeng LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.
Xiao ZouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266042, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was performed to explore the prognostic significance of periostin expression in a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery following radiotherapy. A tissue microarray of tumor samples from 259 patients with early-stage breast cancer was assayed for periostin, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 and Ki-67 expression by immunohistochemistry. The association of periostin with other clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes, including local recurrence free survival (RFS), distant metastasis free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed through log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate analysis. Periostin expression was identified in 91 of the 259 tissue samples (35%). The periostin status was significantly associated with histological grade (P=0.001), nodal status (P=0.023), molecular subtype (P<0.01), ER status (P<0.01), PR status (P<0.01) and Ki-67 expression (P=0.011). Furthermore, periostin expression was associated with an increased risk of five-year local recurrence (95.8% vs. 89.0%; P=0.017) and distant metastasis (92.3% vs. 79.1%; P=0.001) in patients with early stage breast cancer. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model demonstrated that periostin expression was an independent predictor of all clinical outcomes in breast cancer (RFS, P=0.018; DFS, P=0.025; OS, P=0.047). Therefore, it was concluded that periostin is associated with an increased risk of local relapse and distant metastasis in early-stage breast cancer treated with conserving surgery and radiotherapy. This association should be further investigated in larger cohorts to validate the clinical significance of periostin expression.

Indexed as

breast cancerconservative surgeryperiostinprognosisradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29725485
PMCPMC5920502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.