ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Imaging characteristics and pathogenesis of intracranial artery stenosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Predictive Value of Tryptase, Serum Amyloid A and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Biomarker Groups for Large Atherosclerotic Cerebral Infarction.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Long non-coding RNA SNHG1 relieves microglia activation by downregulating miR-329-3p expression in anExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate the imaging characteristics and pathogenesis of intracranial artery stenosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction. In total, 84 patients diagnosed with acute cerebral infarction were recruited. Magnetic resonance angiography was performed to detect the existence of intracranial artery stenosis or occlusion. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted imaging were employed to analyze the infarction types and characteristics. In the majority of patients, the infarction resulted from internal carotid stenosis (77 cases; 91.7%), while it was caused by vertebral artery stenosis in a small number of cases (7 cases; 8.3%). Multiple infarction was identified the most common type of infarction among all cases (69.0%). The most common types of infarctions in the internal carotid system were multiple infarction implicating both the cortex and centrum ovale (23.4%), and internal watershed infarction (22.1%). Although the number of cases was relatively small, multiple infarction was observed to have a high incidence in the vertebral artery system. Bedside electrocardiogram was also recorded to determine the sinus rhythm and examine the abnormal hemodynamics. The sinus bradycardia rate of patients with multiple infarction was markedly greater in comparison with that in single infarction patients (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.