ArticleHeredity2019
Occurrence of subdioecy and scarcity of gender-specific markers reveal an ongoing transition to dioecy in Himalayan seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. turkestanica).
Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitotic karyotyping and FISH mapping of the gender-specific locus indicate an advanced XY system inJournal of genetics · 2026Article
- Reversibility of sex changes in the plant kingdom: more important than we thought?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Development and validation of sex-linked molecular markers for rapid and accurate identification of male and female Hippophae tibetana plants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Variable resource allocation pattern, biased sex-ratio, and extent of sexual dimorphism in subdioecious Hippophae rhamnoides.PloS one · 2024Article
- The Systematics, Reproductive Biology, Biochemistry, and Breeding of Sea Buckthorn-A Review.Genes · 2023Review
- The coexistence of hermaphroditic and dioecious plants is associated with polyploidy and gender dimorphism inPlant diversity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dioecy and the dynamics of its evolution are intensely investigated aspects of plant reproduction. Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. turkestanica) is an alpine shrub growing wild in certain parts of western Himalaya. The previous studies have reported heteromorphic sex chromosomes in the species and yet marker-based studies indicate high similarity between the male and female genomes. Lack of information on sexual system in the species has further complicated the situation. A systematic study was thus undertaken to understand the sexual system in seabuckthorn and to discern the extent of similarity/dissimilarity between the male and female genomes by generating a large number of markers using amplified fragment length polymorphism and representational difference analysis. Floral biology and regular monitoring of species revealed the presence of polygamomonoecious (PGM) plants in most populations at a low percentage (~2-4%). PGM plants showed low pollen production and overall low fertility, suggesting a monoecy-paradioecy pathway at function. The results of the marker study demonstrated that there are limited differences between male and female genomes and these differences were not uniform across the populations in the Leh-Ladakh region, especially when the geographical distance increases. Results also suggest that a dynamic partitioning of genomes is operational between the two genders of seabuckthorn and differences are not homogenized across the populations. Both reproductive biology-based and DNA marker-based studies indicate that genders have separated recently. The present study proposes seabuckthorn as a promising model system to study evolution of dioecy and sex determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.