ArticleScientific reports2018
Synchronization by uncorrelated noise: interacting rhythms in interconnected oscillator networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Downmodulation of Potassium Conductances Induces Epileptic Seizures in Cortical Network Models Via Multiple Synergistic Factors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating the Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Cortical Oscillations and Network Dynamics.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The Roles of Potassium and Calcium Currents in the Bistable Firing Transition.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Potassium and Calcium Currents in the Bistable Firing Transition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Structural spine plasticity: Learning and forgetting of odor-specific subnetworks in the olfactory bulb.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Synchronization Through Uncorrelated Noise in Excitatory-Inhibitory Networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Distinct effects of heterogeneity and noise on gamma oscillation in a model of neuronal network with different reversal potential.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Paradoxical phase response of gamma rhythms facilitates their entrainment in heterogeneous networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Asynchronous and Coherent Dynamics in Balanced Excitatory-Inhibitory Spiking Networks.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Top-down inputs drive neuronal network rewiring and context-enhanced sensory processing in olfaction.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Antagonistic Phenomena in Network Dynamics.Annual review of condensed matter physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oscillators coupled in a network can synchronize with each other to yield a coherent population rhythm. How do multiple such rhythms interact with each other? Do these collective oscillations synchronize like individual oscillators? We show that this is not the case: for strong, inhibitory coupling rhythms can become synchronized by noise. In contrast to stochastic synchronization, this new mechanism synchronizes the rhythms even if the noisy inputs to different oscillators are completely uncorrelated. Key for the synchrony across networks is the reduced synchrony within the networks: it substantially increases the frequency range across which the networks can be entrained by other networks or by periodic pacemaker-like inputs. We demonstrate this type of robust synchronization for different classes of oscillators and network connectivities. The synchronization of different population rhythms is expected to be relevant for brain rhythms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.