Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725043›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Facial bone fragmentation in blind cavefish arises through two unusual ossification processes.

Amanda K Powers, Shane A Kaplan, Tyler E Boggs, Joshua B Gross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Making and shaping endochondral and intramembranous bones.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Parallel evolution of regressive and constructive craniofacial traits across distinct populations of Astyanax mexicanus cavefish.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2020
    Article
  6. Dark world rises: The emergence of cavefish as a model for the study of evolution, development, behavior, and disease.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda K PowersDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 45221, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Shane A KaplanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 45221, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tyler E BoggsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 45221, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Joshua B GrossDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 45221, Cincinnati, OH, USA. grossja@ucmail.uc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-1053
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

The developmental and genetic regulators of craniofacial asymmetryR01DE025033 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI GROSS, JOSHUA BENJAMIN · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE025033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise mechanisms underlying cranial bone development, evolution and patterning remain incompletely characterised. This poses a challenge to understanding the etiologies of craniofacial malformations evolving in nature. Capitalising on natural variation, "evolutionary model systems" provide unique opportunities to identify underlying causes of aberrant phenotypes as a complement to studies in traditional systems. Mexican blind cavefish are a prime evolutionary model for cranial disorders since they frequently exhibit extreme alterations to the skull and lateral asymmetries. These aberrations occur in stark contrast to the normal cranial architectures of closely related surface-dwelling fish, providing a powerful comparative paradigm for understanding cranial bone formation. Using a longitudinal and in vivo analytical approach, we discovered two unusual ossification processes in cavefish that underlie the development of 'fragmented' and asymmetric cranial bones. The first mechanism involves the sporadic appearance of independent bony elements that fail to fuse together later in development. The second mechanism involves the "carving" of channels in the mature bone, a novel form of post-ossification remodeling. In the extreme cave environment, these novel mechanisms may have evolved to augment sensory input, and may indirectly result in a trade-off between sensory expansion and cranial bone development.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisAnimalsCharacidaeFacial BonesLongitudinal Studies

Identifiers

PMID29725043
PMCPMC5934472
OpenAlexW2801693814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.