Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29725002›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Rechargeable lithium-ion cell state of charge and defect detection by in-situ inside-out magnetic resonance imaging.

Andrew J Ilott, Mohaddese Mohammadi, Christopher M Schauerman, Matthew J Ganter, Alexej Jerschow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Progress inMagnetic resonance letters · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensitive magnetometry reveals inhomogeneities in charge storage and weak transient internal currents in Li-ion cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Distortion-free inside-out imaging for rapid diagnostics of rechargeable Li-ion cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew J IlottDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Mohaddese MohammadiDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Christopher M SchauermanThe Battery Prototyping Center, Rochester Institute of Technology, 156 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Matthew J GanterThe Battery Prototyping Center, Rochester Institute of Technology, 156 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Alexej JerschowDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY, 10003, USA. Alexej.Jerschow@nyu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When and why does a rechargeable battery lose capacity or go bad? This is a question that is surprisingly difficult to answer; yet, it lies at the heart of progress in the fields of consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and electrical storage. The difficulty is related to the limited amount of information one can obtain from a cell without taking it apart and analyzing it destructively. Here, we demonstrate that the measurement of tiny induced magnetic field changes within a cell can be used to assess the level of lithium incorporation into the electrode materials, and diagnose certain cell flaws that could arise from assembly. The measurements are fast, can be performed on finished and unfinished cells, and most importantly, can be done nondestructively with cells that are compatible with commercial design requirements with conductive enclosures.

Identifiers

PMID29725002
PMCPMC5934497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.