Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724765›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Imaging Differences between Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders and Multiple Sclerosis: A Multi-Institutional Study in Japan.

H Tatekawa, S Sakamoto, M Hori, Y Kaichi, A Kunimatsu, K Akazawa, T Miyasaka, H Oba, T Okubo, K Hasuo and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

H TatekawaFrom the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (H.T., S.S., S.D., T.S., Y.M.), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8050-4895
S SakamotoFrom the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (H.T., S.S., S.D., T.S., Y.M.), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan s-sakamoto@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-4671-0342
M HoriDepartment of Radiology (M.H.), Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-8032
Y KaichiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.K.), Graduate School and Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6213-941X
A KunimatsuDepartment of Radiology (A.K.), Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-2585
K AkazawaDepartment of Radiology (K.A., K.Y.), Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3646-1821
T MiyasakaDepartment of Radiology (T.M.), Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-0929
H ObaDepartment of Radiology (H.O.), Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-5709
T OkuboDepartment of Radiology (T.O.), Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9309-0396
K HasuoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology (K.H.), National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-8768
K YamadaDepartment of Radiology (K.A., K.Y.), Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-3935
T TaokaDepartment of Radiology (T.T.), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-0240
S DoishitaFrom the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (H.T., S.S., S.D., T.S., Y.M.), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4789-8199
T ShimonoFrom the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (H.T., S.S., S.D., T.S., Y.M.), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5847-6587
Y MikiFrom the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (H.T., S.S., S.D., T.S., Y.M.), Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0621-0044
Osaka City University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPHiroshima University · JPJuntendo University · JPNagoya University · JPNara Medical University Hospital · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPTeikyo University · JPTeikyo University Chiba Medical Center · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBoth clinical and imaging criteria must be met to diagnose neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and multiple sclerosis. However, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders are often misdiagnosed as MS because of an overlap in MR imaging features. The purpose of this study was to confirm imaging differences between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and MS with visually detailed quantitative analyses of large-sample data. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively examined 89 consecutive patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (median age, 51 years; range, 16-85 years; females, 77; aquaporin 4 immunoglobulin G-positive, 93%) and 89 with MS (median age, 36 years; range, 18-67 years; females, 68; relapsing-remitting MS, 89%; primary-progressive MS, 7%; secondary-progressive MS, 2%) from 9 institutions across Japan (April 2008 to December 2012). Two neuroradiologists visually evaluated the number, location, and size of all lesions using the Mann-Whitney

resultsWe enrolled 79 patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and 87 with MS for brain analysis, 57 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and 55 with MS for spinal cord analysis, and 42 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and 14 with MS for optic nerve analysis. We identified 911 brain lesions in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, 1659 brain lesions in MS, 86 spinal cord lesions in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and 102 spinal cord lesions in MS. The frequencies of periventricular white matter and deep white matter lesions were 17% and 68% in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders versus 41% and 42% in MS, respectively (location of brain lesions,

conclusionsVisually detailed quantitative analyses confirmed imaging differences, especially in brain and spinal cord lesions, between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and MS. These observations may have clinical implications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainFemaleHumansJapanMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNeuroimagingNeuromyelitis OpticaRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID29724765
PMCPMC7655447
OpenAlexW2800265826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.