Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724758›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2018

Evidence for the temporal regulation of insect segmentation by a conserved sequence of transcription factors.

Erik Clark, Andrew D Peel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Embryogenesis in Myrmicine Ants Combines Features of Short Germ-Band Development With a Progressive Mode of Segmentation.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Same rule, different genes:Science advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Temporal control of RNAi reveals both robust and labile feedback loops in the segmentation clock of the red flour beetle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik ClarkLaboratory for Development and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK ec491@cam.ac.uk a.d.peel@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-796X
Andrew D PeelFaculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK ec491@cam.ac.uk a.d.peel@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-germ insects, such as the fruit fly

Indexed as

DrosophilaGene regulatory networkPair-rule genesPatterningSegmentationTribolium

Identifiers

PMID29724758
PMCPMC6001374
OpenAlexW2801410877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.