Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724482›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2018

Physician visits and the timing of skeletal-related events among men newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer: A cohort analysis.

Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Husam Albarmawi, Kai Sun, C Daniel Mullins, Abdalla Aly, Arif Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eberechukwu OnukwughaPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD; Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: eonukwug@rx.umaryland.edu.
Husam AlbarmawiPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Kai SunPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
C Daniel MullinsPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Abdalla AlyPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Arif HussainMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Optimization of Multi-Modal Therapies in Pre-clinical models of Prostate CancerI01BX000545 · VA · BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HUSSAIN, ARIF · 2009 to 2021
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000545NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035136NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N02 PC015105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMen diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) are at increased risk for skeletal complications which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although both the urologist and the medical oncologist play important roles in the management of patients with advanced PCa, there is limited information regarding their role in the context of skeletal complications. The current study investigated these relationships among newly diagnosed metastatic patients with PCa. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry data for incident stage IV metastatic (M1) cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2007 with linked Medicare claims. Postdiagnosis urologist and medical oncologist visits were identified using billing codes. We considered skeletal-related events (SREs) that occurred after the urologist or medical oncologist visit. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between a physician visit and the timing of the first SRE with and without propensity-score matching to account for observable selection.

resultsThe sample included 5,572 patients with stage IV M1 prostate cancer. Seventy-six percent of the patients were non-Hispanic White, 16% were non-Hispanic African American, and 8% were of other races; 75% of patients saw a urologist (median time to first visit = 19 days) and 44% saw an oncologist (median = 80 days), whereas 41% experienced at least one SRE (median = 309 days). Covariate-adjusted Cox models showed a longer time to an SRE for patients with only a medical oncologist visit (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.45-0.61), only a urologist visit (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.31-0.39) or both a urologist and medical oncologist visit (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.31-0.38), compared to individuals without these visits. Among men with a urologist visit, a medical oncologist visit was not associated with the time to the first SRE (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.90-1.05). Among those without a urologist visit a medical oncologist visit was associated with a longer time to an SRE (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.46-0.64). Results were comparable using propensity-score matched samples.

conclusionAmong men newly diagnosed with metastatic PCa, 4 of 10 patients experienced an SRE. Patients experienced a delay in skeletal complications when managed by a urologist or a medical oncologist compared to patients who did not see either specialist.

Indexed as

Health PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedicarePhysicians' OfficesPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramSpecializationTime-to-TreatmentUnited StatesMedical oncologistProstate cancerSkeletal-related eventsUrologist

Identifiers

PMID29724482
PMCPMC7384484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.