Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724233›Full record

SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2018

Baby-led weaning: what a systematic review of the literature adds on.

Enza D'Auria, Marcello Bergamini, Annamaria Staiano, Giuseppe Banderali, Erica Pendezza, Francesca Penagini, Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti, Diego Giampietro Peroni, Italian Society of Pediatrics

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05771324 (The Effect of Baby-Led Weaning and Traditional Complementary Feeding Education on Infant Development Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05771324 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Baby-Led Weaning and Traditional Complementary Feeding Education on Infant Development Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled62ConditionsGrowth, Infant Development, Complementary Feeding, Nutrition, HealthyArmsBaby-Led Weaning (BLW), Traditional Complementary Feeding (TCF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enza D'AuriaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. enza.dauria@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-5810
Marcello BergaminiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Annamaria StaianoDipartimento di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BanderaliDepartment of Pediatrics ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Department of Health Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Erica PendezzaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesca PenaginiDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gian Vincenzo ZuccottiDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Diego Giampietro PeroniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Paediatrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Italian Society of Pediatrics

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term weaning describes the time period in which a progressive reduction of breastfeeding or the feeding of infant-formula takes place while the infant is gradually introduced to solid foods. It is a crucial time in an infant's life as not only does it involve with a great deal of rapid change for the child, but it is also associated with the development of food preferences, eating behaviours and body weight in childhood and also in adolescence and adulthood.Therefore, how a child is weaned may have an influence later, on the individual's entire life. Babies are traditionally first introduced to solid foods using spoon-feeding, in most countries.Beside to traditional approach, an alternative method, promoting infant self-feeding from six months of age, called baby-led weaning or "auto-weaning", has grown in popularity. This approach causes concern to healthy professionals and parents themselves as data from observational studies pointed out to a potential risk of iron and energy inadequacy as well as choking risk. Aim of this systematic review was to critically examine the current evidence about baby-led weaning approach and to explore the need for future research.A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane library databases and DARE (Database of Abstract of Reviews of Effects), EMBASE and MEDLINE in the period 2000-2018 (up to March 1st) to address some key questions on baby-led weaning. Prisma guidelines for systematic reviews has been followed.After the inclusion/exclusion process, we included for analysis of evidence 12 articles, 10 observational cross-sectional studies and 2 randomized controlled trials. Pooling of results from very different outcomes in the studies included was not possible. Both randomized trials have potential bias; therefore, the quality of the evidence is low.There are still major unresolved issues about baby-led weaning that require answers from research and that should be considered when advices are requested from health professionals by parents willing to approach this method.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAge FactorsBreast FeedingChild DevelopmentCross-Sectional StudiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantInfant FoodInfant, NewbornMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeaning

Identifiers

PMID29724233
PMCPMC5934812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.