Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724207›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Next-of-kin involvement in improving hospital cancer care quality and safety - a qualitative cross-case study as basis for theory development.

Inger Johanne Bergerød, Bjørnar Gilje, Geir S Braut, Siri Wiig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Families' Strategies for Navigating Care for Their Child With Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient facing intervention to improve care transitions for older people moving from hospital to home.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. The patient died: What about involvement in the investigation process?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inger Johanne BergerødStavanger University Hospital, Gerd-Ragna Bloch Thorsens gate 8, 4011, Stavanger, Norway. inger.j.bergerod@uis.no.
Bjørnar GiljeStavanger University Hospital, Gerd-Ragna Bloch Thorsens gate 8, 4011, Stavanger, Norway.
Geir S BrautStavanger University Hospital, Gerd-Ragna Bloch Thorsens gate 8, 4011, Stavanger, Norway.
Siri WiigSHARE - Center for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-of-kin are an extension of healthcare professionals in all stages of cancer care. They offer care activities such as interpretations of symptoms, and reporting of negative or adverse effects of treatment, without any professional knowledge or skills. Their participation is often expected from healthcare professionals, managers, or the patient. However, there is limited knowledge of next-of-kin's role in and contribution to quality and safety improvement in hospital cancer care. The aim of this study was to explore how managers and healthcare professionals understand the role of next-of-kin in cancer care, and what methods they use for next-of-kin involvement.

methodsThe study design was a comparative multiple embedded case study of cancer departments in two Norwegian university hospitals. Data collection methods consist of qualitative interviews with managers (13) and healthcare professionals (19) collected in 2016, and document analysis of policy documents and regulation. The interviews were analyzed according to a directed content analysis approach guided by the theoretical framework 'Organizing for Quality'.

resultsBoth hospitals have a strategy to involve next-of-kin in treatment and care but have no formal way of doing so. Managers and healthcare professionals in the two hospitals illuminated nine areas where next-of-kin are important stakeholders in improving quality and safety. These nine areas (e.g. nutrition, observations, transitions, pain treatment, information, palliative and terminal care) are common across the two hospitals. Key challenges in the next-of-kin involvement pertain to insufficient physical working conditions and room facilities, and lack of continuity of experienced nurses and consultants.

conclusionHospital employees and managers regard next-of-kin as a safety net or a buffer that cannot be replaced by other stakeholders. This study shows a close collaboration between patient, next-of-kin and healthcare professionals in cancer care, but more effort should be invested in more systematic approaches for next-of-kin involvement in quality and safety improvement such as a guide for managers and healthcare professionals on methods and areas of involvement.

Indexed as

FamilyHospitalizationProfessional-Family RelationsCancer Care FacilitiesCase-Control StudiesHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansNeoplasmsNorwayPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareTerminal CareCancerCaregiverCase studyCross case analysisFamilyHospitalsNext-of-kinQualityQuality improvementSafetyTheory development

Identifiers

PMID29724207
PMCPMC5934831
OpenAlexW2802769238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.