Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724199›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Is there an association between spatial accessibility of outpatient care and utilization? Analysis of gynecological and general care.

Ulrike Stentzel, Jeanette Bahr, Daniel Fredrich, Jens Piegsa, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Neeltje van den Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-term exposures to PMBMC cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Tandem Practices: Pediatric Consultation Hours in General Practitioners' Practices in Rural Areas in Germany - a Collaborative Project].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial Accessibility Analysis of Medical Facilities Based on Public Transportation Networks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrike StentzelInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany. ulrike.stentzel@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9723-8677
Jeanette BahrInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Daniel FredrichInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Jens PiegsaInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Neeltje van den BergInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn rural regions with a low population density, distances to health care providers as well as insufficient public transport may be barriers for the accessibility of health care. In this analysis it was examined whether the accessibility of gynecologists and GPs, measured as travel time both by car and public transport has an influence on the utilization of health care in the rural region of Western Pomerania in Northern Germany.

methodsUtilization data was obtained from the population based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Utilization was operationalized by the parameter "at least one physician visit during the last 12 months". To determine travel times by car and by public transport, network analyses were conducted in a Geographic Information System (GIS). Multivariate logistic regression models were calculated to identify determinants for the utilization of gynecologists and GPs.

resultsThere is no significant association between the accessibility by car or public transport and the utilization of gynecologists and GPs. Significant predictors for the utilization of gynecologists in the regression model including public transport are age (OR 0.960, 95% CI 0.950-0.971, p < 0.0001), social class (OR 1.137, 95% CI 1.084-1.193, p < 0.0001) and having persons ≥18 years in the household (OR 2.315, 95% CI 1.116-4.800, p = 0.0241).

conclusionsIn the examined region less utilization of gynecologists is not explainable with long travel times by car or public transport.

Indexed as

AgedAmbulatory CareFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersGeographic Information SystemsGermanyHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleProspective StudiesRural HealthTravelWomen's Health ServicesAccessibilityGISGPGynecologistUtilization

Identifiers

PMID29724199
PMCPMC5934853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.