Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29724186›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Genome-wide expert annotation of the epigenetic machinery of the plant-parasitic nematodes Meloidogyne spp., with a focus on the asexually reproducing species.

Loris Pratx, Corinne Rancurel, Martine Da Rocha, Etienne G J Danchin, Philippe Castagnone-Sereno, Pierre Abad, Laetitia Perfus-Barbeoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. N6-methyladenine DNA modification modulates pathogen virulence in nematodes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA Methyltransferases: From Evolution to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loris PratxUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Corinne RancurelUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Martine Da RochaUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Etienne G J DanchinUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Philippe Castagnone-SerenoUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Pierre AbadUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Laetitia Perfus-BarbeochUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France. laetitia.zurletto@inra.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-LABX-0028-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-13-JSV7-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe renewed interest in epigenetics has led to the understanding that both the environment and individual lifestyle can directly interact with the epigenome to influence its dynamics. Epigenetic phenomena are mediated by DNA methylation, stable chromatin modifications and non-coding RNA-associated gene silencing involving specific proteins called epigenetic factors. Multiple organisms, ranging from plants to yeast and mammals, have been used as model systems to study epigenetics. The interactions between parasites and their hosts are models of choice to study these mechanisms because the selective pressures are strong and the evolution is fast. The asexually reproducing root-knot nematodes (RKN) offer different advantages to study the processes and mechanisms involved in epigenetic regulation. RKN genomes sequencing and annotation have identified numerous genes, however, which of those are involved in the adaption to an environment and potentially relevant to the evolution of plant-parasitism is yet to be discovered.

resultsHere, we used a functional comparative annotation strategy combining orthology data, mining of curated genomics as well as protein domain databases and phylogenetic reconstructions. Overall, we show that (i) neither RKN, nor the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans possess any DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) (ii) RKN do not possess the complete machinery for DNA methylation on the 6th position of adenine (6mA) (iii) histone (de)acetylation and (de)methylation pathways are conserved between C. elegans and RKN, and the corresponding genes are amplified in asexually reproducing RKN (iv) some specific non-coding RNA families found in plant-parasitic nematodes are dissimilar from those in C. elegans. In the asexually reproducing RKN Meloidogyne incognita, expression data from various developmental stages supported the putative role of these proteins in epigenetic regulations.

conclusionsOur results refine previous predictions on the epigenetic machinery of model species and constitute the most comprehensive description of epigenetic factors relevant to the plant-parasitic lifestyle and/or asexual mode of reproduction of RKN. Providing an atlas of epigenetic factors in RKN is an informative resource that will enable researchers to explore their potential role in adaptation of these parasites to their environment.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenomeAnimalsArgonaute ProteinsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationHistonesPhylogenyPlant RootsPlantsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProtozoan ProteinsReproduction, AsexualRNA, Small UntranslatedTylenchoideaArgonaute ProteinschromomethylaseDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesHistonesProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Small UntranslatedAdaptationAsexual reproductionChromatinEpigeneticsFunctional comparative annotationHistone modificationsMeloidogyneOrthologyPlant parasitismRoot-knot nematodes

Identifiers

PMID29724186
PMCPMC5934874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.