ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Comparison of Resonance Frequency Analysis and of Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Dental Implant Osseointegration.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an Angular Stiffness Sensor to Measure Dental Implant Stability In Vitro.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Influencing factors and evaluation methods for early stability of immediate implant.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Evaluation of micromotion in multirooted root analogue implants embedded in synthetic bone blocks: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Overview of Ultrasound in Dentistry for Advancing Research Methodology and Patient Care Quality with Emphasis on Periodontal/Peri-implant Applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- Effect of LED photobiomodulation on dental implant osseointegration: An in vivo study.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of Bone Mineral Density Based on Backscattering Resonance Phenomenon Using Coregistered Functional Laser Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Probes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Ultrasound Imaging in Dentistry: A Literature Overview.Journal of imaging · 2021Review
- Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The normal stiffness of the edentulous alveolar process.Bone reports · 2021Article
- 3D‑printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds combined with pulse electromagnetic fields enhance osseointegration in osteoporosis.Molecular medicine reports · 2021Article
- FEM Analysis Applied to OT Bridge Abutment with Seeger Retention System.European journal of dentistry · 2021Article
- Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A review on the latest advancements in the non-invasive evaluation/monitoring of dental and trans-femoral implants.Biomedical engineering letters · 2020Review
- Elastography of the bone-implant interface.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- FEM Analysis of Dental Implant-Abutment Interface Overdenture Components and Parametric Evaluation of EquatorMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives.Biosensors · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental implants are widely used in the clinic. However, there remain risks of failure, which depend on the implant stability. The aim of this paper is to compare two methods based on resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and that aim at assessing implant stability. Eighty-one identical dental implants were inserted in the iliac crests of 11 sheep. The QUS and RFA measurements were realized after different healing times (0, 5, 7, and 15 weeks). The results obtained with the QUS (respectively RFA) method were significantly different when comparing two consecutive healing time for 97% (respectively, 18%) of the implants. The error made on the estimation of the healing time when analyzing the results obtained with the QUS technique was around 10 times lower than that made when using the RFA technique. The results corresponding to the dependence of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.