Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29723952›Full record

ReviewToxins2018

Why is Skeletal Muscle Regeneration Impaired after Myonecrosis Induced by Viperid Snake Venoms?

José María Gutiérrez, Teresa Escalante, Rosario Hernández, Stefano Gastaldello, Patricia Saravia-Otten, Alexandra Rucavado

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Crosstalk of Inflammation and Coagulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Autophagy in muscle regeneration: potential therapies for myopathies.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022
    Review
  19. ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

José María GutiérrezInstituto Clodomiro Picado, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica. jose.gutierrez@ucr.ac.cr.ORCID 0000-0001-8385-3081
Teresa EscalanteInstituto Clodomiro Picado, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica. teresa.escalante@ucr.ac.cr.
Rosario HernándezFacultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala City 01012, Guatemala. rosariodamarish@gmail.com.
Stefano GastaldelloDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-17177, Sweden. stefano.gastaldello@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-8452
Patricia Saravia-OttenFacultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala City 01012, Guatemala. psaravia02@gmail.com.
Alexandra RucavadoInstituto Clodomiro Picado, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica. alexandra.rucavado@ucr.ac.cr.
Universidad de Costa Rica · CRUniversidad de San Carlos de Guatemala · GTBinzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle regeneration after myonecrosis involves the activation, proliferation and fusion of myogenic cells, and a coordinated inflammatory response encompassing phagocytosis of necrotic cell debris, and the concerted synthesis of cytokines and growth factors. Myonecrosis often occurs in snakebite envenomings. In the case of venoms that cause myotoxicity without affecting the vasculature, such as those of many elapid snakes, regeneration proceeds successfully. In contrast, in envenomings by most viperid snakes, which affect the vasculature and extracellular matrix in addition to muscle fibers, regeneration is largely impaired and, therefore, the muscle mass is reduced and replaced by fibro-adipose tissue. This review discusses possible causes for such poor regenerative outcome including: (a) damage to muscle microvasculature, which causes tissue hypoxia and affects the inflammatory response and the timely removal of necrotic tissue; (b) damage to intramuscular nerves, which results in atrophy of regenerating fibers; (c) degradation of muscle cell basement membrane, compromising the spatial niche for proliferating myoblasts; (d) widespread degradation of the extracellular matrix; and (e) persistence of venom components in the damaged tissue, which may affect myogenic cells at critical points in the regenerative process. Understanding the causes of poor muscle regeneration may pave the way for the development of novel therapeutic interventions aimed at fostering the regenerative process in envenomed patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansMuscle, SkeletalNecrosisRegenerationViperidaeViper VenomsViper Venomsenvenomingextracellular matrixmuscle regenerationmyonecrosisphospholipases A2snake venomsnake venom metalloproteinasesvasculature

Identifiers

PMID29723952
PMCPMC5983238
OpenAlexW2800959733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.