ArticlePharmacotherapy2018
Variation in Cardiovascular Risk Related to Individual Antimuscarinic Drugs Used to Treat Overactive Bladder: A UK Cohort Study.
Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of vibegron on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with overactive bladder: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Blood pressure monitoring · 2022Trial
- Research progress in myocardial function and diseases related to muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of Solifenacin combined with Mirabegron in treating overactive bladder in female patients following bladder instillation for bladder cancer.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Patient and Clinician Challenges with Anticholinergic Step Therapy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2023Review
- CYP2D6 Substrate Dispensing Among Patients Dispensed Mirabegron: An Administrative Claims Analysis.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2023Article
- Observational
- Antimuscarinic Cascade Across Individual Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Older Adults with Dementia.Drugs & aging · 2021Article
- Overactive Bladder Prescribing Considerations: The Role of Polypharmacy, Anticholinergic Burden, and CYP2D6 Drug‒Drug Interactions.Clinical drug investigation · 2021Review
- Toward a broader view of mechanisms of drug cardiotoxicity.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Review
- Validation of cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the United Kingdom.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2021Article
- Risk of Mortality Associated with Non-selective Antimuscarinic medications in Older Adults with Dementia: a Retrospective Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlocking muscarinic receptors could have an effect on cardiac function, especially among elderly patients with overactive bladder (OAB). STUDY
objectiveTo investigate the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in users of antimuscarinic drugs to treat OAB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsCohort study of new users of darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, or trospium, 18 years or older, in the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), 2004-2012. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsUsing tolterodine as the reference, we estimated propensity-score-stratified incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, CV mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a combined end point of the previous three), and all-cause death for individual antimuscarinic drugs. The study cohort included 119,912 new users of OAB drugs. The mean age at cohort entry was 62 years, 70% were female, and the mean follow-up was 3.3 years. The adjusted IRR for MACE and current use of oxybutynin compared with current use of tolterodine was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.30). In contrast, the IRR was 0.65 (CI 0.56-0.76) for current use of solifenacin compared with tolterodine. In this study, performed with health care data, the distribution of risk factors was relatively similar across users of different OAB drugs and, although our analyses controlled for a range of measured potential confounders, residual confounding cannot be ruled out.
conclusionsIn an observational comparative study of users of medications to treat OAB conducted in routine clinical practice, the risk for CV side effects was increased in users of oxybutynin and decreased in users of solifenacin compared with users of tolterodine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.