Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29723204›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Stopping at a red light: Recruitment of inhibitory control by environmental cues.

Shachar Hochman, Avishai Henik, Eyal Kalanthroff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05350033 (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control in Addictions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05350033 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control in Addictions: a Triple-blinded, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsSubstance-Related DisordersArmstDCS - tDCS, tDCS - Sham, Sham - tDCS, Sham - Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Snapping Out of Autopilot: Overriding Habits in Real Time and the Role of Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shachar HochmanDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Avishai HenikDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Eyal KalanthroffDepartment of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental cues can influence basic perceptual and attentional processes especially in an emotional context. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effect of a non-emotional common environmental cue-a traffic light-on a higher cognitive operation-inhibition. In two experiments, we administered a novel version of the stop-signal task, in which the go task was to determine the color of a traffic light. In order to investigate the influence of each of the cues on inhibitory processes, separate tracking procedures (one for each cue) were applied simultaneously to the stop-signal delay. In Experiment 1, we found that reaction time in no-stop-signal trials was faster when a green traffic light was present, whereas stop-signal reaction time was longer when a red traffic light was present. In Experiment 2, neutral control cues were used in addition to a red and green light. The results indicate that the differences between red and green stem from an association between the color red and stop processes (rather than from the green-go association). These results strengthen previous findings showing the effect of environmental cues on attentional processes and go beyond them by showing that the effect is not restricted to emotional cues. Most importantly, the current study results suggest that environmental cues can also influence complex cognitive operations such as inhibitory control. These results might have specific implications for our understanding of the processes that underlie specific psychiatric disorders characterized by inhibitory deficit.

Indexed as

CuesEnvironmentInhibition, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29723204
PMCPMC5933707
OpenAlexW2802354648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.