Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29723193›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

(S)WASH-D for Worms: A pilot study investigating the differential impact of school- versus community-based integrated control programs for soil-transmitted helminths.

Naomi E Clarke, Archie C A Clements, Salvador Amaral, Alice Richardson, James S McCarthy, John McGown, Stuart Bryan, Darren J Gray, Susana V Nery

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Zoonotic Ancylostomiasis: An Update of a Continually Neglected Zoonosis.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Improved latrines minimally impactScience in One Health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi E ClarkeResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1894-8185
Archie C A ClementsResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Salvador AmaralResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Alice RichardsonResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
James S McCarthyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
John McGownPlan International Timor-Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste.
Stuart BryanCruz Vermelha Timor-Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste.
Darren J GrayResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Susana V NeryResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Australian National University · AUUniversidade da Paz · TLQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoil-transmitted helminths (STH) infect nearly 1.5 billion individuals globally, and contribute to poor physical and cognitive development in children. STH control programs typically consist of regular delivery of anthelminthic drugs, targeting school-aged children. Expanding STH control programs community-wide may improve STH control among school-aged children, and combining deworming with improvements to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) may further reduce transmission. The (S)WASH-D for Worms pilot study aims to compare the differential impact of integrated WASH and deworming programs when implemented at primary schools only versus when additionally implemented community-wide. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA two-arm, non-randomized cluster intervention study was conducted. Six communities were identified by partner WASH agencies and enrolled in the study. All communities received a school-based WASH and deworming program, while three additionally received a community-based WASH and deworming program. STH infections were measured in school-aged children at baseline and six months after deworming. Over 90% of eligible children were recruited for the study, of whom 92.3% provided stool samples at baseline and 88.9% at follow-up. The school WASH intervention improved school sanitation, while the community WASH intervention reduced open defecation from 50.4% (95% CI 41.8-59.0) to 23.5% (95% CI 16.7-32.0). There was a trend towards reduced odds of N. americanus infection among children who received the community-wide intervention (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07-2.36, p = 0.32).

conclusionsThis pilot study provides proof of principle for testing the hypothesis that community-wide STH control programs have a greater impact on STH infections among children than school-based programs, and supports the rationale for conducting a full-scale cluster randomized controlled trial. High recruitment and participation rates and successful implementation of school WASH programs demonstrate study feasibility and acceptability. However, eliminating open defecation remains a challenge; ongoing work is required to develop community sanitation programs that achieve high and sustainable latrine coverage.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12615001012561.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsAnthelminticsAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHelminthiasisHelminthsHumansHygieneMalePilot ProjectsResidence CharacteristicsSanitationSchoolsAnthelminticsSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID29723193
PMCPMC5933686
OpenAlexW2799350918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.