Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29723032›Full record

ArticlePsychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy2019

"I knew it was wrong the moment I got the order": A narrative thematic analysis of moral injury in combat veterans.

Philip Held, Brian J Klassen, Joanne M Hall, Tanya R Friese, Marcel M Bertsch-Gout, Alyson K Zalta, Mark H Pollack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The moderating role of emotion dysregulation in the relation between potentially morally injurious experiences and alcohol misuse among military Veterans.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip HeldDepartment of Psychiatry.
Brian J KlassenDepartment of Psychiatry.
Joanne M HallCollege of Nursing, University of Tennessee.
Tanya R FrieseCollege of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center.
Marcel M Bertsch-GoutDepartment of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center.
Alyson K ZaltaDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center.
Mark H PollackDepartment of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center.

Funding

Using CBT to Probe Psychobiobehavioral Resilience to Post-trauma PsychopathologyK23MH103394 · NIMH · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZALTA, ALYSON KAY · 2014 to 2018
$769k
American Psychological AssociationBrain and Behavior Foundation, and the Illinois DepartmentCohn Family FoundationEdgemont PharmaceuticalsJannsenNational Institute of HealthNational Institute of Mental HealthNIMH NIH HHS K23 MH103394Wounded Warrior Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMoral injury is a nascent construct intended to capture reactions to events that violate deeply held beliefs and moral values. Although a model of moral injury has been proposed, many of the theoretical propositions of this model have yet to be systematically studied.

methodWe conducted semistructured interviews with eight veterans who reported experiencing morally injurious events during war zone deployments.

resultsUsing narrative thematic analysis, five main themes and associated subthemes emerged from the data. The main themes capture the timing of the event, contextual factors that affected the decision-making process during the morally injurious event, reactions to the moral injurious event, search for purpose and meaning, and opening up.

conclusionThe findings from the present study supported an existing model of moral injury, while extending it in several important ways. Preliminary clinical recommendations and directions for future research are discussed based on the study findings. These include directly exploring the context surrounding the morally injurious event, examining the veterans' moral appraisals, and helping them assume appropriate responsibility for their actions to reduce excessive self-blame. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

MoralsStress, PsychologicalWar ExposureAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlcoholismDecision MakingHierarchy, SocialHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNarrationVeterans

Identifiers

PMID29723032
PMCPMC6215519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.