ArticleChinese medical journal2018
Personalized Critical Hemodynamic Therapy Concept for Shock Resuscitation.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Importance of clinical parameters for cultivation of critical care thinking by online teaching of critical care medicine.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Recognizing blood pressure patterns in sedated critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation by spectral clustering.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- PPV May Be a Starting Point to Achieve Circulatory Protective Mechanical Ventilation.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Critical hemodynamic therapy oriented resuscitation helping reduce lung water production and improve survival.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
- Resuscitation incoherence and dynamic circulation-perfusion coupling in circulatory shock.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
- Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Reduction Associated With Higher Cardiac Output (CO) Favors Good Prognosis of Circulatory Shock: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.