ArticleNeural regeneration research2018
End-to-end and end-to-side neurorrhaphy between thick donor nerves and thin recipient nerves: an axon regeneration study in a rat model.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A New Rat Model of Sacral Cord Injury Producing a Neurogenic Bladder and Its Functional and Mechanistic Studies.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Nerve function restoration following targeted muscle reinnervation after varying delayed periods.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Outcomes after Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer.Journal of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury · 2023Article
- The TGF-β1 pathway is early involved in neurogenic bladder fibrosis of juvenile rats.Pediatric research · 2021Article
- Collateral Sprouting of Peripheral Sensory Neurons Exhibits a Unique Transcriptomic Profile.Molecular neurobiology · 2020Article
- Time course analysis of sensory axon regenerationNeural regeneration research · 2020Article
- Ascorbic Acid Facilitates Neural Regeneration After Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During nerve reconstruction, nerves of different thicknesses are often sutured together using end-to-side neurorrhaphy and end-to-end neurorrhaphy techniques. In this study, the effect of the type of neurorrhaphy on the number and diameter of regenerated axon fibers was studied in a rat facial nerve repair model. An inflow-type end-to-side and end-to-end neurorrhaphy model with nerve stumps of different thicknesses (2:1 diameter ratio) was created in the facial nerve of 14 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. After 6 and 12 weeks, nerve regeneration was evaluated in the rats using the following outcomes: total number of myelinated axons, average minor axis diameter of the myelinated axons in the central and peripheral sections, and axon regeneration rate. End-to-end neurorrhaphy resulted in a significantly greater number of regenerated myelinated axons and rate of regeneration after 6 weeks than end-to-side neurorrhaphy; however, no such differences were observed at 12 weeks. While the regenerated axons were thicker at 12 weeks than at 6 weeks, no significant differences in axon fiber thickness were detected between end-to-end and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Thus, end-to-end neurorrhaphy resulted in greater numbers of regenerated axons and increased axon regeneration rate during the early postoperative period. As rapid reinnervation is one of the most important factors influencing the restoration of target muscle function, we conclude that end-to-end neurorrhaphy is desirable when suturing thick nerves to thin nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.