ReviewNeural regeneration research2018
Dissecting the multifactorial nature of demyelinating disease.
Review in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Heterogeneity and Molecular Markers for CNS Glial Cells Revealed by Single-Cell Transcriptomics.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2022Review
- Extracellular Matrix in Neural Plasticity and Regeneration.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2022Review
- Clinical manifestations and imaging features of white matter demyelination in older patients.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Role of macrophages in peripheral nerve injury and repair.Neural regeneration research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan-4 (CSPG4) is a surface component of two key cell types (oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) and myeloid cells) present in lysolecithin-induced lesions in mouse spinal cord. Two types of CSPG4 manipulations have been used to study the roles of these cells in myelin damage and repair: (1) OPC and myeloid-specific ablation of CSPG4, and (2) transplantation of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-labeled progenitors to distinguish between bone marrow-derived macrophages and resident microglia. Ablation of CSPG4 in OPCs does not affect myelin damage, but decreases myelin repair, due to reduced proliferation of CSPG4-null OPCs that diminishes generation of mature oligodendrocytes for remyelination. Ablation of CSPG4 in myeloid cells greatly decreases recruitment of macrophages to spinal cord lesions, resulting in smaller initial lesions, but also in significantly diminished myelin repair. In the absence of macrophage recruitment, OPC proliferation is greatly impaired, again leading to decreased generation of myelinating oligodendrocytes. Macrophages may promote OPC proliferation via phagocytosis of myelin debris and/or secretion of factors that stimulate OPC mitosis. Microglia are not able to substitute for macrophages in promoting OPC proliferation. An additional feature of lesions in myeloid-specific CSPG4 null mice is the persistence of poorly-differentiated platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.