Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29722305›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2018

Young blood products: emerging treatment for Alzheimer's disease?

Rita Khoury, Elias Ghossoub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rita KhouryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Elias GhossoubDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder and no disease-modifying treatment is currently available. Research has shown that while brain neurogenesis continues in adult life, it declines with age. Using parabiosis, plasma transfusions and direct administration of neural growth factors, animal studies have demonstrated the positive impact of exposure to young blood products on neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity in an aging brain. The hippocampus and the sub-ventricular zones were identified as the main regions affected. Promising findings have prompted researchers to experiment their effects in subjects with an established neurocognitive disorder, such as Alzheimer's disease. They argued that modification of brain vasculature, reactivation of adult neural stem cells, and remodeling of their synaptic activity/plasticity may lead to cognitive enhancement and increased neurogenesis. One pilot human study found that young donor plasma infusion protocols for adults with Alzheimer's disease were safe and feasible; however, no statistically significant improvements in cognition were detected. There is a need to conduct additional placebo-controlled human studies in larger samples. Future studies should focus on identifying an "optimal age" at which an intervention in humans may yield significant cognitive enhancement, as well as determining the types of transfusions with the best efficacy and tolerability profiles.

Indexed as

agingAlzheimer's diseasecognitionneurogenesisplasma transfusionrejuvenationyoung blood

Identifiers

PMID29722305
PMCPMC5950663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.