Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29722131›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2018

The Science of Salt: A focused review on salt-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, and gender differences.

Briar McKenzie, Joseph Alvin Santos, Kathy Trieu, Sudhir Raj Thout, Claire Johnson, JoAnne Arcand, Jacqui Webster, Rachael McLean

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Salt-related practices and its association with 24-hour urinary sodium excretion in an Uruguayan population cohort.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Knowledge and Practices Related to Salt Intake among Saudi Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Briar McKenzieThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6972-6617
Joseph Alvin SantosThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kathy TrieuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-2741
Sudhir Raj ThoutThe George Institute for Global Health India, Unit No. 301, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Claire JohnsonThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-7651
JoAnne ArcandFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-6905
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3513-3340
Rachael McLeanDepartment of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-328X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current review was to examine the scope of studies published in the Science of Salt Weekly that contained a measure of self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and behavior (KAB) concerning salt. Specific objectives were to examine how KAB measures are used to evaluate salt reduction intervention studies, the questionnaires used, and whether any gender differences exist in self-reported KAB. Studies were reviewed from the commencement of Science of Salt Weekly, June 2013 to the end of August 2017. Seventy-five studies had relevant measures of KAB and were included in this review, 13 of these were salt-reduction intervention-evaluation studies, with the remainder (62) being descriptive KAB studies. The KAB questionnaires used were specific to the populations studied, without evidence of a best practice measure. 40% of studies used KAB alone as the primary outcome measure; the remaining studies used more quantitative measures of salt intake such as 24-hour urine. Only half of the descriptive studies showed KAB outcomes disaggregated by gender, and of those, 73% showed women had more favorable KAB related to salt. None of the salt intervention-evaluation studies showed disaggregated KAB data. Therefore, it is likely important that evaluation studies disaggregate, and are appropriately powered to disaggregate all outcomes by gender to address potential disparities.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenchmarkingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSex FactorsSodium Chloride, DietarySurveys and QuestionnairesSodium Chloride, Dietarybehavior changeconsumer attitudesconsumer knowledgesalt reductionsodium

Identifiers

PMID29722131
PMCPMC8031068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.